[darcs-users] CVS workflow vs. darcs workflow

Juliusz Chroboczek jch at pps.jussieu.fr
Tue Oct 12 18:43:35 UTC 2004


> What's the equivalent recommended workflow in darcs?

  http://www.abridgegame.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2004-July/002387.html

I wrote that over three months ago, and I still work the way described.

> darcs record --no-test   # just for the purpose of pulling new changes
> darcs pull
> darcs unrecord # because I wasn't really ready to commit

Yes.

> If this is really so much better, why not build the functionality
> into "pull"?

Pull basically works that way.

The whole point of the above is that the sequence is not atomic: if
the pull generates conflicts, you can decide what to do before you
unrecord.

``Couldn't commute past pending'' basically means that there were
merge conflicts in the unrecord phase of the above.

                                        Juliusz




More information about the darcs-users mailing list