[darcs-users] surprised by `darcs record --ask-deps`

[Tommy Pettersson]

On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:46:44PM +0200, Albert Reiner wrote:
> As Darcs did not ask me about the first patch, I assume that this is
> because the second patch already implicitly depends on the first one;

correct

> onthe other hand, both patches touch disjoint sets of lines and should
> therefore be independent in my naive understanding.
> 
> Can someone shed some light on this?

pass

(I think that if patches didn't depend on adjacent lines,
commutations could succeed in crazy ways.)

> By the way, is there a way of getting the list of patches a given
> patch depends on?

No, but you can pull it to an empty repo, although that will
also pull patches that the depended patches depend on, and
so on...


-- 
Tommy Pettersson <ptp at lysator.liu.se>