[darcs-users] darcs tells me its consistent but doesn't seem to be so
Lst Recv
listrecv at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 01:33:26 UTC 2005
On 12/14/05, Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek at pps.jussieu.fr> wrote:
> > and then push to it, I get files that are out of sync from the
> > pushee. Stuff from old versions crops up.
>
> > darcs whatsnew shows nothing (as it should).
>
> Hmm, I've never seen something like that. What does ``darcs check'' say?
C:\XXXXXXXXX\working>darcs check
Applying patch 63 of 63... done.
The repo is consistent!
>
> Can we have a copy of the repo? (Don't send it to the list, put a tar
> on the web somewhere.)
>
I'm sorry, I'm doing it for employment and don't have the right to give it out.
> (Stephen, relax. Except for the fact that he's posting anonymously,
> which I agree is annoying, the OP is behaving fine.)
>
> Juliusz
>
Thanks for the help, Juliusz. Like I said, darcs is very appealing,
but these frequent stumbling blocks are proving to be quite difficult.
Let me know if there's any other info you need.
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list