[darcs-users] darcs tells me its consistent but doesn't seem to be so

[Lst Recv]

C:\XXXXXXXXXXX\working>darcs resolve
No conflicts to resolve.

On 12/14/05, Lst Recv <listrecv at gmail.com> wrote:
>  On 12/14/05, Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek at pps.jussieu.fr> wrote:
>  > > and then push to it, I get files that are out of sync from the
>  > > pushee.  Stuff from old versions crops up.
>  >
>  > > darcs whatsnew shows nothing (as it should).
>  >
>  > Hmm, I've never seen something like that.  What does ``darcs check'' say?
>
>  C:\XXXXXXXXX\working>darcs check
>  Applying patch 63 of 63... done.
>  The repo is consistent!
>
>  >
>  > Can we have a copy of the repo?  (Don't send it to the list, put a tar
>  > on the web somewhere.)
>  >
>
> I'm sorry, I'm doing it for employment and don't have the right to give it out.
>
>  > (Stephen, relax.  Except for the fact that he's posting anonymously,
>  > which I agree is annoying, the OP is behaving fine.)
>  >
>  >                                         Juliusz
>  >
>
> Thanks for the help, Juliusz.  Like I said, darcs is very appealing,
> but these frequent stumbling blocks are proving to be quite difficult.
>  Let me know if there's any other info you need.
>