[darcs-users] unrecord --matches and --patches (was: Re: Feature Request: darcs unrecord --all)

[Quag]

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:15:19 +0000 (UTC), Mark Stosberg
<mark at summersault.com> wrote:
> On 2005-02-25, Quag <quaggy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would like unrecord to have an "--all" option. "--all" would be the
> > same as repeatedly running darcs unrecord and answering "y" to the
> > question. It should probably only be valid when --patch or --tag is
> > also included.
> 
> First, I think that '--matches' and '--patches' need to be added,
> which are standard ways to select multiple patches. In fact, these
> options imply you want 'all' the matches, not just one. So the "--all"
> command may not be needed.

Unrecord already has --matches, --patches and --tag but they only seem
to select a single patch. If this inconsistency was cleared up, then
the new --all would serve the same role as the --all on record; --all
performs the action without querying the user.

Jonathan.