[darcs-users] unrecord --matches and --patches (was: Re: Feature Request: darcs unrecord --all)

Jamie Webb j at jmawebb.cjb.net
Sat Feb 26 18:49:57 UTC 2005


On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:36:19AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> On the whole, I don't think that this change should be too hard.  I don't
> expect I'll start on it right now, so if someone else wants to give it a
> shot, that would be great.  In anycase, someone (Jamie?) could file a bug
> on it.

Done.

> Printing a summary on revert also sounds like a good idea, so filing a bug
> on that would also be nice.

For revert, the summary should presumably look like whatsnew -s. For
unpull/unrecord, should it run annotate -s for each patch, or just
display the patch names?

The advantage of showing the summary is that it gives a reminder of
the contents of the patch, so people can double-check that it's the
one they want before binning it. The disadvantage is that in the
case of multiple patches selected, the list of patches (which is far
more important) will be obscured by other information, and may even
vanish off the top of the scrollback buffer.

-- Jamie Webb




More information about the darcs-users mailing list