[darcs-users] Re: Trouble with "darcs push"

[Erik Schnetter]

On Saturday 26 February 2005 12:35, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
> In article <d9c9c834a7103cb73780ca8927742a46 at helicor.com>,
>
>  Kirstin Penelope Rhys <kirstin.rhys at helicor.com> wrote:
> > In general, perhaps DARCS_REMOTE
> > could be an environment variable override?
>
> That would work as a hack for me, but in general you'd want a
> different DARCS_REMOTE for each remote repository you talk to.

This problem was discussed before...  The consensus was that it would be 
cleanest to implement such a thing as a repository setting; there could 
be some local repository configuration item that specifies which remote 
darcs executable to run.

I didn't quite agree, and I posted a patch that adds a new option 
"--executable-location" that lets you specify the location of the 
remote executable on the command line.  If this is what you need, I 
could post it again.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at aei.mpg.de>   http://www.aei.mpg.de/~eschnett/

My email is as private as my paper mail.  I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20050227/a0e79190/attachment.pgp