[darcs-users] Re: cache-name-proposal
Juliusz Chroboczek
jch at pps.jussieu.fr
Mon Jan 24 22:25:39 UTC 2005
Just to make sure there's no mis-understanding, you accept that
(1) --foo-current-cache becomes --foo-pristine;
You haven't expressed an opinion on
(2) _darcs/current.none becomes _darcs/pristine.none;
There is no decision yet on
(3) _darcs/current/ becomes _darcs/pristine/
My gut feeling is that (2) and (3) should either both be done, or
neither should. I also think that (2) and (3) are a *bad* idea
(gratuitiously breaking compatibility without gaining anything), but
if you still want them, I'll write the code.
Juliusz
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list