[darcs-users] Re: how to redistribute darcs+Eclipse
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Wed Jun 8 04:11:00 UTC 2005
>>>>> "Ketil" == Ketil Malde <ketil.malde at bccs.uib.no> writes:
Ketil> I would then suggest that emails are sufficient, at least
Ketil> from authors of relatively minor contributions
Unfortunately, current US copyright law means that there are _no_
minor contributions, unless $30,000--$150,000 statutory damages per
infringement (which might be construed to mean per version released,
for example) is minor.
Personally, I would take a countersigned PGP signature from a major
keyring, as (1) it would be a presumptive defense against deliberate
infringement---I tried to confirm the assignment---and (2) somebody
who tried to deny it would have to show that either the signature was
faked or stolen, or risk a perjury rap themselves. I would also want
indemnification from the contributor.
IANAL, but I think the risk of statutory damages means you want to
take more than trivial precautions, and probably ask a real lawyer
unless you know the contributors well.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list