[darcs-users] Re: how to redistribute darcs+Eclipse
Ketil Malde
ketil.malde at bccs.uib.no
Wed Jun 8 19:12:34 UTC 2005
Jamie Webb <j at jmawebb.cjb.net> writes:
> I agree with the rest of what you said though. A patch is considered a
> derived work,
Are you sure? Is there legal precedence on this? Are you willing to
bet the cost of a copyright lawsuit?
I find it strange that something I write isn't mine to do what I want
with -- even if it is a modification to something else. (But then I
find a lot of so-called intellectual property strange)
> and the GPL states that by distributing a derived work,
> you implicitly GPL that work
Agreed.
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list