[darcs-users] idea: darcs record multi-patch mode

Nigel Rowe rho at swiftdsl.com.au
Sun Mar 13 21:53:58 UTC 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:05, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:08:26 -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> > On the implementation side, this could be challenging.  The patch
> > selection interface uses a backend (PatchChoices) that's based on a split
> > of the patches into three groups: "yes", "no" and "maybe".  It's
> > certainly possible to split into N groups, but it's not trivial.
>
> Given this possiblity i'd like to be able to drop a hunk into the
> editor, and produce two hunks, one for patch Na and one for path Nb,
> because sometimes hunk boundry is not the same as logic boundry...

Even without the proposed ability to record multiple changesets (ie patch 
names) in a single pass, I'd like the ability to split hunks.

I can already record multiple changesets by recording in multiple passes, but 
as Yuval said "sometimes hunk boundry is not the same as logic boundry"

- -- 
	Nigel Rowe
	rho at swiftdsl.com.au


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCNLaBBbmcM2pfckkRAvPnAJ0X8WJ/utoEbFuNbKb+qMONh3EbGwCeO6Vs
aQHOfZKoOoGRAzQ4S3TbRiI=
=w8hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the darcs-users mailing list