[darcs-users] the readability of darcs native change format (was: Re: SchwernLikesDarcs SchwernHatesDarcs)
mark at summersault.com
Sun Mar 20 03:27:25 UTC 2005
On 2005-03-20, Michael G Schwern <schwern at pobox.com> wrote:
> I'm also keeping note of what I hate about darcs
re: the hard-to-read native format. Have you tried looking at
patches with 'darcs diff -p patch_name'? It uses the Real diff
program in the binary.
I understand this much about the technical details of the darcs patch
- It saves disk space by not storing context in the patches.
- Consequently, there can be a performance penalty for constructing
the context to display it, since it's not in the patch.
Personally, sometimes I like the lack of context because it's compact.
If I'm reviewing patches during 'record', I might have the context in my
head, and don't need to to take up screen real estate right then.
Other times I would like to have that context, and would just assume
that darcs used more disk space and gave me better performance.
In unrelated news, I should have something releasable as 'alpha' of a
darcs performance testing script soon.
More information about the darcs-users