[darcs-users] should we support .darcs too? (was: Re: SchwernLikesDarcs SchwernHatesDarcs)
jsnitow at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 01:44:42 UTC 2005
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:36:37 -0800, Michael G Schwern <schwern at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 03:17:01AM -0800, Julian Snitow wrote:
> > I like being able to type a default `ls' and immediately see that a
> > directory is also a darcs repository, without having to muck around
> > with my shell's settings. Seeing _darcs is a friendly reminder that
> > says, "I am your own personal branch of project FOO, not some puny
> > distribution directory!"
> Yeah, I've seen that argument. I don't buy it. I've never forgotten that
> a directory is under version control. I don't know anyone who has.
> And its just "ls .darcs" to check.
> And then there are those cases where I *want* to forget that its under
> version control. If, as I'm currently doing using subversion, I want to
> put a repository checkout straight into /var/www on a web server. 
> I want the fact that its a checkout to be hidden from normal users.
On the other hand, I like being able to instantly know when I can
`darcs get' a directory online. It's like an invitation to get,
modify, and `darcs send' useful stuff back to the maintainer. You
know, the sort of things that makes darcs so
If you don't want users to treat it as a repository, use `darcs dist'
to make a snapshot tarball, and use that instead. If you just want to
have a nice, clean repository online, with only the code you're proud
of, then `darcs push' to it, and cherry-pick your patches.
> But so far these are very small problems. I'm still waiting for my initial
> "yuck" factor to wear off.
For me, _darcs is a "yum" factor.
You have a consistent face for your repository whether it's on *nix,
the web, or Windows, you can instantly recognize when someone else has
published their repository for your benefit, it stands out (and you
can always tell whether a directory is the top of a sub-repository, or
just a subdirectory of a higher repository), it keeps things simple,
it doesn't break anything, and the soundest argument against it is
aesthetic (and a disputed aesthetic, at that!).
More information about the darcs-users