[darcs-users] Re: argh. please change the name "unpull"
John S. Yates, Jr.
jyates at netezza.com
Mon Mar 21 17:56:04 UTC 2005
"Quag" <quaggy at gmail.com> wrote in message
> I agree with a workflow approach, and for this reason drop is not a
> great name, but it still isn't an argument to keep unpull as the name.
> Unpull currently describes a number of workflow tasks: 1) unpull, 2)
> unapply, 3) discard-a-record, 4) get-rid-of-a-patch-someone-pushed,
> and so on.
Impression from a newbie trying to internalize a sense of the darcs
It is important that the common understanding that a new user brings to
the learning experience pan out. As a learning barrier false similarity
is worse than opaque names to be learned by rote. (So, given that unpull
generates so much controversy would we be better off calling it cdr :-)
It seems to me that unpull is inherently part of "cherry picking". If
that is the case then emphasizing selection might help. How about names
like decline? reject? omit? skip?
More information about the darcs-users