[darcs-users] Re: rollback & revert

[Junio C Hamano]

>>>>> "AM" == Alexei Matveev <matveev at theochem.tu-muenchen.de> writes:

AM> What is the best way to
AM>     "rollback" both repo state AND working copy state.
AM> As far as I understand
AM>     rollback
AM> leaves the working copy in a "modified" state,
AM> so that one need to
AM>     revert,
AM> but only newly appeared "local changes" due
AM> to rollback.

Wound't that be "darcs unpull", which was a topic on another
thread?