[darcs-users] Re: rollback & revert

Tommy Pettersson ptp at lysator.liu.se
Tue Mar 22 20:57:22 UTC 2005


On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:33:30AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> AM> What is the best way to
> AM>     "rollback" both repo state AND working copy state.
> AM> As far as I understand
> AM>     rollback
> AM> leaves the working copy in a "modified" state,
> AM> so that one need to
> AM>     revert,
> AM> but only newly appeared "local changes" due
> AM> to rollback.
> 
> Wound't that be "darcs unpull", which was a topic on another
> thread?

No, unpull deletes the patch from the repo.  Rollback
neutralizes it with an inverted patch so you can go back to
the point where the patch existed again.


-- 
Tommy Pettersson <ptp at lysator.liu.se>




More information about the darcs-users mailing list