[darcs-users] Re: .darcs is portable
dzsekijo at creo.hu
Wed Mar 30 22:42:47 UTC 2005
On 2005-03-21, Michael G Schwern <schwern at pobox.com> wrote:
> Still don't know if .darcs is worth the trouble... just reporting the facts.
I know that Schwern and maybe some others would prefer .darcs... I just
can't get why.
I as darcs doens't use one external collection of the repos rather does
everything in place, the only indicator of the presence of darcs control
are the metadata files/dirs. If you make them hidden, you hide a
precious information. It seems to me that .darcs would just obfuscate
Thats just my $0.02, of course.
More information about the darcs-users