[darcs-users] Re: .darcs is portable
Michael G Schwern
schwern at pobox.com
Thu Mar 31 04:51:25 UTC 2005
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:25:07AM +0000, Csaba Henk wrote:
> > * I've never forgotten that a directory is under version control, so I don't
> > think having "_darcs" in the file listing to remind me is a real use case.
>
> Your mileage may vary. I can imagine that if there are multiple versions
> (copies) of the dir, then I'd get confused.
Yes, its nice that darcs puts everything ONE directory instead of one in
each directory.
> Also that I remember wanting
> to put a dir under version control, but then I forget actually doing
> so... Well, it's really up to one's character.
You might forget but darcs won't blow over it...
0 ~/tmp$ darcs init
0 ~/tmp$ darcs init
darcs failed: Unable to "darcs initialize" here.
Ok, so the error message isn't terribly informative but that's fixable.
(RT 303)
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list