[darcs-users] Re: .darcs is portable

[Aaron Denney]

On 2005-03-31, Michael G Schwern <schwern at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:26:51AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>> I, too, would prefer .darcs, but:
>> 
>> On 20050330T211445-0400, zooko wrote:
>> > darcs should do things like Subversion does them
>> 
>> Why?  Why Subversion, exactly?  Why not CVS or Arch?
>
> One can lump CVS and Subversion together, conceptually, as they have 
> (deliberately) very similar command sets.  So one can use them fairly
> interchangably when talking about a RCS/CVS/SVN style command set.

And since CVS doesn't hide it's metadir "CVS", we shouldn't hide our
metadir "_darcs".

-- 
Aaron Denney
-><-