[darcs-users] Re: .darcs is portable
wnoise at ofb.net
Thu Mar 31 17:30:47 UTC 2005
On 2005-03-31, Michael G Schwern <schwern at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:26:51AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>> I, too, would prefer .darcs, but:
>> On 20050330T211445-0400, zooko wrote:
>> > darcs should do things like Subversion does them
>> Why? Why Subversion, exactly? Why not CVS or Arch?
> One can lump CVS and Subversion together, conceptually, as they have
> (deliberately) very similar command sets. So one can use them fairly
> interchangably when talking about a RCS/CVS/SVN style command set.
And since CVS doesn't hide it's metadir "CVS", we shouldn't hide our
More information about the darcs-users