[darcs-users] `darcs replace` behaving strangely - bug?
Albert Reiner
areiner at tph.tuwien.ac.at
Mon May 9 13:45:10 UTC 2005
Hi,
I just did the following with darcs 1.0.2:
- `darcs revert`, meaning there are no unrecorded changes after that.
- $ darcs replace --token='[^<>]' \
"enter equations for \uderaBax" \
"enter equations for \uderEaBax" ar-soft-scoza.nw
- $ darcs replace derivaBax derivEaBax ar-soft-scoza.nw
- $ darcs replace derivaBaxFun derivEaBaxFun ar-soft-scoza.nw
Now `darcs whatsnew` gives me the following:
,----
| {
| hunk ./nw/ar-soft-scoza.nw 2468
| -<<enter equations for \uderaBax>>=
| +<<enter equations for \uderEaBax>>=
| hunk ./nw/ar-soft-scoza.nw 2500
| -<<enter equations for \uderaBax>>=
| +<<enter equations for \uderEaBax>>=
| hunk ./nw/ar-soft-scoza.nw 2609
| -<<enter equations for \uderaBax>>=
| +<<enter equations for \uderEaBax>>=
| hunk ./nw/ar-soft-scoza.nw 2789
| -<<enter equations for \uderaBax>>
| +<<enter equations for \uderEaBax>>
| replace ./nw/ar-soft-scoza.nw [A-Za-z_0-9] derivaBax derivEaBax
| replace ./nw/ar-soft-scoza.nw [A-Za-z_0-9] derivaBaxFun derivEaBaxFun
| }
`----
Shouldn't this just show three replace hunks instead?
Regards,
Albert.
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list