[darcs-users] darcs and git

[Thomas Zander]

Hi Daan,

various (most) questions have been answered in threads started just after 
the BK problem came out; please refer to the archives (see URL at bottom) 
for answers and come back for things you failed to find there.


On Monday 09 May 2005 18:59, Daan Leijen wrote:
> As some of you might know Linus is developing his
> own "patch-management system" called "git" to manage
> the Linux development tree. I personally can hardly
> believe that the Linux community is developing a
> new tool from sratch instead of using one of the
> existing SCM's like Darcs :-(
>
> The touted reason is performance: the Linux kernel
> tree is huge. However, it would in my opinion be much
> more worthwile to optimize an existing system instead
> of hacking some new thing together.
>
> This brings me to my question: How is the situation
> regarding the performance of Darcs? I heard David (?)
> is trying to improve performance of Darcs on large
> repositories. Can someone enlighten me where Darcs
> lacks performance for the Linux repository? Will Darcs
> ever be fast enough?  (and in what timeframe?)
>
> This would be an excellent time to start managing the
> Linux tree with Darcs -- it seems the ultimate opportunity
> for Darcs to become the next big thing :-)
>
> All the best,
> -- Daan Leijen.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-users mailing list
> darcs-users at darcs.net
> http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20050509/2ef2adeb/attachment.pgp