[darcs-users] Doesn't the _darcs dir bug you?
Wolfgang Jeltsch
wolfgang at jeltsch.net
Fri Nov 11 13:22:09 UTC 2005
Am Donnerstag, 10. November 2005 17:46 schrieb Richard A. Smith:
> Albert Reiner wrote:
> [...]
> Since I have a lot of stuff in windows just changing from _darcs to
> .darcs* won't change anything. You would actually have to mark the
> directory as hidden.
I made the naming convention .darcs* with POSIX in mind. The intention was to
make the darcs directory hidden. So under Windows, the "hidden" flag should
be set.
> I don't see that as really worth the effort to try and maintain that across
> all platforms darcs supports.
What platform you can think about which is neither Windows nor POSIX
compatible?
> [...]
> I think a proper directory structure is a better answer. Perhaps it
> should be added to the "Best Practices" on the wiki.
Maybe the user shouldn't be forced to use a proper directory structure for
his/her source tree but darcs should use a "proper directory structure",
meaning that darcs init shouldn't modify the source tree by adding a
directory to it but should store its repository meta-information elsewhere.
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list