[darcs-users] Re: send.sh test still fail
Gaetan Lehmann
gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr
Thu Nov 17 14:51:44 UTC 2005
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:54:14 +0100, David Roundy <droundy at darcs.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:34:44PM +0900, Jens Petersen wrote:
>> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>> > I can't get why, but I can't reproduce that problem today. The test
>> > pass without problem !
>>
>> > Perhap's Jens can still reproduce it ?
>>
>> Yep, but only in the Fedora Extras buildsystem, which uses mock to
>> build in a
>> minimal buildroot. It build fine with mock on my own workstation.
>>
>> For now I'm just skipping send.sh for Fedora Extras.
>
> Ah, I think I know what it is. Darcs requires that /usr/sbin/sendmail be
> present (during configure) in order to hard-code the path to the binary
> that will be used for sending email. You can get around this by
> specifying
>
> ./configure --with-sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail
>
> when configuring. If darcs has no idea where to locate sendmail, the
> email-sending capability is turned off--even if --with-sendmail is passed
> to darcs on the command line. The debian build scripts have a mailer as
> a
> build-dependency (which is indeed a nasty hack).
>
> Another approach would just to be to hard-code /usr/sbin/sendmail if we
> can't locate a sendmail at configure time...
Thanks for the explanation.
using
%configure --with-sendmail=%{_sbindir}/sendmail
in the spec file is fine to me.
However, shoudn't send.sh be disabled if darcs is build without mail
support ?
--
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list