[darcs-users] Using darcs over SSH with more then one user

[Jeroen Budts]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

zooko at zooko.com wrote:
>>For write access i'm not really sure what i should do...
> I suggest that you turn it around -- instead of giving developer X write access
> to your repo, you instead arrange for you to have read access to his repo, and
> you pull from it regularly.
> 
That's indeed a possibility.. Maybe i could set up a mailinglist for the
developers to send and receive patches..
But i'm not entirely sure that i like the feeling that the 'official'
repository completely depends on me to receive it's patches. This would
mean that there would be no updates to that repo if i'm away for a few
weeks..
On the other side... For the devs this wouldn't be a problem because
they would receive the patches through the mailinglist. So it would only
 matter for non-dev people that want to try out the latest code.

How do other projects do this?

Greetz,
Jeroen

- --
<TeRanEX/>
 --- e-mail:   jeroen at lightyear.be - jid: teranex at jabber.org
 --- blog: http://budts.be/weblog/ - cv:  http://budts.be/jeroen/
 --- projects: http://lightyear.be - pgp: 0x8B7B774A

___________________________________
GetFirefox.com - rediscover the web

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDRY9HH04wF4t7d0oRAnMZAJ9Q9sNgPcrUNeKEIDzvAs6MvIzr0wCfYm88
9w2GGFdGyCp41OytzKolHfw=
=WHZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----