[darcs-users] understanding darcs boring regexp's

Tim var at sp1r1t.de
Sat Jul 1 11:21:13 UTC 2006

On Saturday 01 July 2006 12:39, Jamie Webb wrote:
> Sorry, but it's /very/ well documented. The manual says it's a regex.

there's more than one type of regex, and i'm sure you know that. with this 
attitude towards documentation, darcs won't get the attention it deserves.

i agree with you on the fact that the darcs manual should not contain info on 
how to use regex, but i don't see why you mention this here. nobody claimed 
it should.

bop [at] sp1r1t [dot] de

More information about the darcs-users mailing list