[darcs-users] darcs 1.0.6 release
Zachary P. Landau
kapheine at gmail.com
Thu Mar 9 19:08:12 UTC 2006
[snipsnip]
> I'd like to know what you think of this idea.
I'm not totally against these ideas, but I do wonder what the purpose is.
I understand the purpose when there is a large project, with many developers,
so that they can plan. But darcs is a smaller project. Most of the submissions
are handled by Tommy or Juliusz, not a large tree of maintainers. And darcs is
still in experimental development where developers are 'playing
around' in a sense
to see what works.
I'm definitely not trying to say that there is no value in having a
more strict release
schedule, but I myself do not see a big need. Perhaps you could explain why it
would be helpful? In more specific terms than just saying we could plan around
releases.
--
Zachary P. Landau <kapheine at gmail.com>
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list