[darcs-users] darcs whatsnew --dont-look-for-adds

[Brian Ericson]

Odd.  My message got truncated somehow.  The following is what I'd
intended to send and what's in my "sent" folder:

I should have thought to grep _darcs!  The files are listed in pending as
{
addfile ...
.
.
}

I see that if I "darcs record -l" and specify "n" for "addfile", that
they get
added to pending.  Specifying "w" for "addfile" forces me to view the "hunk"
for the file as well, but keeps the addfile/hunk out of pending.  I'm
not sure
what I think of this...  I realize I got myself into this by mixing
source with
artifacts (and not updating my boring file), but I wonder if either
alternative
makes as much/more sense:
o Adding a "b" option for addfile changes that updates the boring file to
include the new file and doesn't alter pending
o Having "n" on addfile not touch pending.

Thanks for your help!  This was really annoying me!  :)

bme at visi.com wrote:
> I should have thought to grep _darcs!  The files are listed in pending as
> {
> addfile ...
>
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-users mailing list
> darcs-users at darcs.net
> http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
>
>