[darcs-users] symbolic links

[Ketil Malde]

Albert Reiner <areiner at tph.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

> What I want is for darcs to ignore that those are symbolic links, and
> to treat the file contents as if they were hard links or copies, at
> least as an optional behavior.  This also seems to be the behavior of
> least surprise, and it is the way things used to be.

What would happen if both the symlink and its target is under version
control.  Do you record and apply the same change twice?

If you want symlinks, isn't it easiest to have a (version-controlled)
script set them up? 

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants