[darcs-users] *practical* differences between darcs' patch model and git/mercurial's?

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Sun Oct 21 09:24:57 UTC 2007

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:46:34AM -0700,
 Adam Megacz <megacz at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote 
 a message of 33 lines which said:

> with git or mercurial, even a "passive" developer who pulls these
> two patches will need to add an additional content-free patch to
> merge them.

I regard this as a huge practical problem and this is the main reason
why I hate Mercurial.

More information about the darcs-users mailing list