[darcs-users] *practical* differences between darcs' patch model and git/mercurial's?
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Sun Oct 21 09:24:57 UTC 2007
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:46:34AM -0700,
Adam Megacz <megacz at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote
a message of 33 lines which said:
> with git or mercurial, even a "passive" developer who pulls these
> two patches will need to add an additional content-free patch to
> merge them.
I regard this as a huge practical problem and this is the main reason
why I hate Mercurial.
More information about the darcs-users