[darcs-users] *practical* differences between darcs' patch model and git/mercurial's?
jgoerzen at complete.org
Mon Oct 22 15:44:05 UTC 2007
On 2007-10-21, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:46:34AM -0700,
> Adam Megacz <megacz at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote
> a message of 33 lines which said:
>> with git or mercurial, even a "passive" developer who pulls these
>> two patches will need to add an additional content-free patch to
>> merge them.
> I regard this as a huge practical problem and this is the main reason
> why I hate Mercurial.
It's not content-free if you must commit a merge patch, but anyway:
it's a big reason I like Mercurial. I have a log of who merged
something in, and when, which I don't get in Darcs.
More information about the darcs-users