[darcs-users] darcs patch: major refactor of SelectChanges to work ... (and 5 more)
David Roundy
droundy at darcs.net
Tue Aug 19 15:51:51 UTC 2008
Hi Jason,
I'm applying this entire patch bundle, except for the partial unrevert
patch (which nothing seems to depend on). I'm doing so without any
review (beyond what I did last week), just because it seems that I'm
getting too far behind.
As I mentioned in a different email, there is indeed a problem in
considerMergeToWorking (and likewise the the related functions
tentativelyMergePatches and tentativelyMergePatches_)... but I didn't
find that by reviewing these changes, in fact I think it was already
present.
David
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:43:33PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> David,
>
> Here is a big bundle I have locally including all the refactors to
> SelectChanges, including the removal of some of the separate_* functions.
>
> I couldn't remove two of them.
>
> Thanks!
> Jason
>
> Tue Aug 12 20:16:25 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com>
> * major refactor of SelectChanges to work with type witnesses
>
> Tue Aug 12 21:43:54 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com>
> * make WhatsNew work with type witnesses
>
> Tue Aug 12 22:04:25 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com>
> * refine type witnesses in SelectChanges
>
> Tue Aug 12 22:38:37 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com>
> * partial type witnesses in Unrevert
>
> Fri Aug 15 13:11:25 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com>
> * correct a bug in with_selected_patches_from_repository
> Fixing this bug allows w_s_p_f_r to have the expected type signature
> and also corrects a problem where the non-selected patches were returned
> in the wrong context.
>
> Fri Aug 15 15:26:35 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com>
> * replace separate_middle_last_from_first and separate_last_from_first_middle with get_choices
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list