[darcs-users] darcs patch: More ChangeLog entries since 2.0.2

[Eric Y. Kow]

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:59:09 -0400, David Roundy wrote:
> Right now, I think it's premature to tag a prerelease, as we've had a
> number of recent regressions, some of them my own fault.  Do you think
> a prerelease would motivate developers to fix bugs?

Hmm! What regressions? It would be nice if we had some sort of summary
of regressions since 2.0.2.

Are these things that are in bugs.darcs.net already, because if so I'm
itching to use that new ReleaseCritical_2.0.3 tag.

I think it'd be easier to tell whether a prelease would help if we had
first had the must-fix list

Cheers,

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20080827/427033d4/attachment.pgp