[darcs-users] can we remove --no-pristine-tree?

[Eric Kow]

On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:23:25 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote:
> I can confirm that --no-pristine-tree is ignored for hashed repos. Whether
> that's intentional or a bug, I can't tell. I'd consider it a documentation bug
> at least (or commandline parsing, if you will, I'd expect darcs to at least
> issue a warning that it is ignoring the flag).

It seems like this is the kind of feature we can just remove altogether
without causing much pain to our users.

Thoughts?

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20081209/6eca30da/attachment.pgp