[darcs-users] wording for SFC agreement (oversight committee again)

[Florent Becker]

Ian Lynagh wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:21:47PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> 
>> What do you think of Karen's proposed language for the putting Oversight
>> Committee into the SFC contract?  Shall we go ahead and sign the
>> agreement with this wording?
>> 
>> The Oversight Committee, each a signatory hereto,
> 
> Does that mean we have to post pieces of paper back and forth? And again
> each time we add/remove someone?
> 
>> shall represent the
>> roject in its official communication with the Conservancy. [Members of
>> the Oversight Committee may be added or removed from the Committee at
>> any time by a majority vote of the Oversight Committee.]
> 
> Tied => no action?
> 
"The comitee shall always have a number of members that is not divisible by
any integer mentioned in its status"

Solves the 3/4 problem too (more than 3/4 means more than a number which
cannot be an integer, hence no border case)

Florent