[darcs-users] wording for SFC agreement (oversight committee again)

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Eric Kow writes:

 > There were some questions about rounding and tie votes, but I think we
 > can address those by making explicit that we shall err on the side of
 > conservatism (for example, abstentions could be counted as a vote for
 > the status quo, and any ties will be resolved in favour of the status
 > quo).

IIRC you have an odd number of members, so that can be simplified to
"must be approved by a simple majority of members."  (Ie, not a
majority of votes must be yes, but a majority of members must vote
yes, to approve a change.)  That's pretty strong, though it may be
appropriate.