[darcs-users] optimize --reorder-patches no longer needed by hashed darcs-2 format?
Eric Kow
kowey at darcs.net
Sun Dec 28 12:18:47 UTC 2008
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 23:14:52 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> > Splitting into 'Options and Advanced Options' might be a good thing to
> >do.
>
> That part we already have. I think Ben is talking about adding a third
> group, "Legacy options".
Yikes! (at the alarmingly large and growing holes in my brain).
For some reason, I was thinking that there were two things which could
be split into basic/advanced and that we had only done one of them and
not the other... I think at the time I was thinking we had done
basic/advanced commands and still needed to get around to basic/advanced
options.
Anyway, no comment on legacy options
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20081228/a8f12038/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list