[darcs-users] Darcs in kernel-like development model

Miklos Vajna vmiklos at frugalware.org
Sat Feb 9 14:44:10 UTC 2008


On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 05:15:19AM +0200, Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi at mithrandi.za.net> wrote:
> This is only true if patch B does not depend on patch A. If I understand
> correctly, it should theoretically be possible to attempt to commute A
> and B, resulting in a conflict, but darcs does not have any way to
> perform such an operation. In addition, to resolve the conflict, you
> would either need to record another patch, or amend-record B, which
> produces a new patch B' that now conflicts with B (!!).

hm, that's true. if patch A depends on patch B, then you can't push just
patch A in darcs, while a rebase could so something like: you remove
patch B from the repo, get a conflict, resolve and then record.

- VMiklos
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20080209/e3a1a9f6/attachment.pgp 


More information about the darcs-users mailing list