[darcs-users] Darcs' Direction (from re: GHC and Darcs)
Max Battcher
me at worldmaker.net
Wed Jul 30 22:51:07 UTC 2008
Don Stewart wrote:
> Speaking as a GHC dev, I think the mood is more,
>
> a) darcs is lacking clear project direction and energy, which is
> slowing down our project, and slowing dev uptake.
>
> since we know GHC produces damn fine code.
Thanks Don, that seems to be the clearest thesis I've yet seen on the
subject. Certainly much more constructively useful than the header of
the current DarcsEvaluation wiki page...
I'm mostly just a modest (a ton of "small" repositories) user of darcs,
but as a user of darcs I'm very encouraged by the things that I've been
seeing with regards to darcs 2 and even just activity on this mailing
list, so I certainly don't entirely share the sentiment...
However, this seems a like a perfect conversation piece and let's open
this up as more general questions, because I'm fascinated what people
might think on this subject:
* What's the current direction of darcs?
* What direction should darcs take?
* Is there a lack of "energy" in darcs?
* If there is a lack of "energy" in darcs, what should be done to
promote it?
* If there is a healthy level of "energy", how best should that be made
apparent?
But, more specifically:
* How can darcs show to GHC a clear direction?
* How can darcs help speed development of GHC?
* How can GHC help provide a clear direction to darcs?
* How can GHC promote "energy" in darcs?
I certainly don't have any answers, but I'm willing to bet that just
having better questions out there might help refine the conversation and
aid everyone involved...
Maybe.
--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list