[darcs-users] darchaeology, and other darcs tools
Eric Kow
eric.kow at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 17:36:16 UTC 2008
> I still think that we shouldn't put tools into the darcs repository that we
> aren't willing to support. For instance, I'd rather take darcs.cgi out
> than add darcsweb in. (No, this isn't a threat to take darcs.cgi out, but
> merely to point out that just because it's distributed with darcs doesn't
> mean it works... as discovered recently when someone tried to use
> darcs.cgi.)
Would a dedicated/standalone darcs-contrib repository be useful? (we
could move darcs.cgi there). I suppose we could use a cursory-review
model, where we basically push in anything that looks like it was
submitted in good faith.
Maybe it would help for collecting a bunch of little scripts that
nobody really wants to maintain.
I have no opinion on the matter. Zooko: if you think this may be a
good idea, would you be willing to take care of it? I guess we could
host it on darcs.net if David agrees.
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list