[darcs-users] announcing darcs 2.1.0pre3

[Eric Kow]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 15:19:46 -0400, Max Battcher wrote:
> meaningful when it shows up in .dpatch-es.  For instance, "Patch-salt:" 
> would provide more information about what that field is and why the UI 
> hides it but it is contained in the patches.  Or maybe something even 
> more generic, for instance "Hidden:", if there are plans to use these 
> hidden fields for other purposes such as third party patch metadata (or 
> user metadata).

Interesting thought.  The code is designed to allow us to rename or
add more ignorable fields in the future.  Indeed "Patch salt" sounds
more informative.  Send a patch?
 
> By the way, with the way the behavior works in pre3, if I add an 
> "Ignore-this:" line of my own anywhere in the long description, does it 
> also become invisible in the darcs UI?

Yes

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20081002/cecf0172/attachment.pgp