[darcs-users] darcs patch: fix wrong ../path in failing issue1013 test

David Roundy daveroundy at gmail.com
Sun Oct 5 03:34:23 UTC 2008

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Trent W. Buck <trentbuck at gmail.com> wrote:
> David Roundy <droundy at darcs.net> writes:
>> Something like darcs pull -n 30-100 should work, you'd just have to count
>> backwards.
> "darcs pull --help" doesn't mention any -n switch in 2.1.0pre2.  Is this
> a bug in the documentation?

You're right, I didn't check.  darcs pull doesn't support
match_several_or_range (like changes), but just match_several.  I
wonder if there's any reason we couldn't allow range matching? It does
use a different matching API, I believe, so we'd have to do some work
to allow the -n flag...


More information about the darcs-users mailing list