[darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Sun Oct 5 08:57:06 UTC 2008


On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 10:34:55 +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I've just noticed a long running darcs processes consuming 100% CPU here
> (9 hours of run). Following buildbots waterfall display it seems it
> should run update now. The same situation seems to be on zooko's nexenta
> box. The question is, what's wrong with latest darcs on Solaris? Do you
> have any idea?

Uh-oh! I have been doing some work translating our remaining Perl
regression tests into shell and have made some mistakes along the
way.  I think I know what I did wrong in the issue595 test and am
looking into it now.

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20081005/e8e37ac5/attachment.pgp 


More information about the darcs-users mailing list