[darcs-users] darcs patch: Allow dist command to take a tag argument (issue 286).

Stephen Hicks sdh33 at cornell.edu
Tue Oct 7 16:48:14 UTC 2008


To be honest, I don't actually understand the difference (as far as
implementation goes) - I just monkeyed around with the code from diff
until it worked.  So I can't really speak either way.

-steve

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:50 AM, David Roundy <droundy at darcs.net> wrote:
> I'm wondering if we would be better of with a simpler patch that
> doesn't include the --store-in-memory option? I don't think darcs dist
> is such a performance-critical command that we need to give the user
> the option of speeding it up at the cost of some memory use.  Unless
> you're thinking that with a more flexible dist, it could be used for
> perfomance-critical purposes?


More information about the darcs-users mailing list