[darcs-users] enfranchising darcs?

David Roundy daveroundy at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 17:35:00 UTC 2008

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Don Stewart <dons at galois.com> wrote:
> I'd also worry about the investment though: cabal has taken 6 years to
> write, and is comparable to darcs in size, but the result is a robust
> package and distribution system used by 1000s of people. How much effort
> can we hope to sync into franchise?

I'd say that this indicates that cabal is solving the wrong problem
for darcs.  Darcs' existing autoconf-based build system took less than
a few months to write, and is still way ahead of cabal in terms of the
functionality needed by darcs.  By solving the problem we need a
solution for, we have a much easier job.  I'd say that if six years of
work on cabal hasn't made it good enough, it's naive to imagine that
another year or two will.


More information about the darcs-users mailing list