[darcs-users] darcs patch: clarify the short help for --pipe (and 3 more)
Eric Kow
kowey at darcs.net
Sun Sep 21 21:20:03 UTC 2008
I'm pushing the first two of these and the last one straight to stable.
Thanks, Simon and sorry for the delay!
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 13:54:37 -0700, Simon Michael wrote:
> Thu Sep 18 12:37:17 PDT 2008 Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com>
> * clarify the short help for --pipe
>
> Thu Sep 18 13:45:00 PDT 2008 Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com>
> * user manual corrections regarding what record and tag --pipe prompt for
>
> Thu Sep 18 13:52:34 PDT 2008 Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com>
> * manual: simplify tag --pipe example to show just the new prompts introduced by this option
>
> Thu Sep 18 13:53:53 PDT 2008 Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com>
> * manual: add an example of record --pipe prompts similar to tag --pipe docs
clarify the short help for --pipe
---------------------------------
> -pipe = DarcsNoArgOption [] ["pipe"] Pipe "expect to receive input from a pipe"
> +pipe = DarcsNoArgOption [] ["pipe"] Pipe "ask user interactively for the patch metadata"
user manual corrections regarding what record and tag --pipe prompt for
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
manual: simplify tag --pipe example to show just the new prompts introduced by this option
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com>**20080918205234] hunk ./src/Darcs/Commands/Tag.lhs 136
> \begin{verbatim}
> What is the date? Mon Nov 15 13:38:01 EST 2004
> Who is the author? David Roundy
> - What is the version name? 3.0
> - Finished tagging patch 'TAG 3.0'
> \end{verbatim}
Is this really a good thing for us to be doing? It seems like it would
be more comfortable for somebody reading the documentation to see things
in context
manual: add an example of record --pipe prompts similar to tag --pipe docs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +which to provide the input. Here's an example of what the \verb!--pipe!
> +prompts look like:
> +
> +\begin{verbatim}
> + What is the date? Mon Nov 15 13:38:01 EST 2004
> + Who is the author? David Roundy
> + What is the log? One or more comment lines
> +\end{verbatim}
I'm pushing this too, but see my comments for the above.
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20080921/9ca4eff5/attachment.pgp
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list