[darcs-users] darcs patch: Resolve issue1102: Ignore future 'junk' ... (and 1 more)

[Eric Kow]

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:00:57 -0400, David Roundy wrote:
> Why not simply use rollback? This is indeed what it's designed for,
> and it works perfectly for this purpose.

Yeah, maybe that would have been smarter.

I just wanted to avoid having resolve issue27, then rollback bits that
generate junk, then restore junk in the history.  But we basically have
this anyway.

Let me give this a shot sometime later

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20080926/56c553b2/attachment-0001.pgp