[darcs-users] darcs patch: Implement Repository.Repair to provide p... (and 3 more)

[Eric Kow]

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 18:11:02 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote:
> the slowdown itself is not a blocker, I'd agree. However, the memory
> consumption might be more of an issue -- it will currently hold up to 100
> patches worth of files in memory. Fixing that is the other part of the changes
> I have proposed -- about the SlurpDirectory (or SlurpMonad) refactor, which I
> am not sure how would look like yet and where I think it might be more of a
> risk than we can afford for 2.1.

Ok.  Well then let's push this to the next release!

> > Also, for this particular case, maybe it would be useful to have
> >   darcs check --only-test
> Well, depending on how timings turn out after we improve check/repair times,
> I'd probably try to avoid that extra flag and the associated clutter.

Yeah, we do generally try to avoid introducing new flags and commands if
we can help it.

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20080927/1d890f70/attachment.pgp