[darcs-users] Help understanding the push with conflicts message

Dan Pascu dan at ag-projects.com
Fri Apr 10 04:58:42 UTC 2009


On Friday 10 April 2009, Eric Kow wrote:
> > As a second thought, this makes me also wonder if there'd be benefit
> > in being able to:
> >
> > % darcs push --last-remote
>
> I'm not particularly keen on adding new switches to darcs unless there
> is a compelling reason.  So if we can find an acceptable workflow that
> doesn't need one, that's better.  New switches are nice when they cover
> a lot of different ground at once on the other hand (thus obviating
> any future requests for new switches...)

I agree. I'd hate to see darcs enter a creeping-featurism area. Commands 
and switches should be as generic and orthogonal as possible, avoiding 
commands or switches that are just particular shortcuts for particular 
workflows.

-- 
Dan


More information about the darcs-users mailing list