[darcs-users] "Static Gitit" site.

Trent W. Buck trentbuck at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 00:03:57 UTC 2009


On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:43:42AM -0400, Gwern Branwen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Trent W. Buck <trentbuck at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Daniel Carrera <daniel.carrera at theingots.org> writes:
> >>> Gitit uses filestore, and filestore aims at multiple backends.
> >>
> >> Doesn't seem like a valuable feature if the price is poor
> >> performance. We don't need multiple backends.
> >
> > Gwern, would performance improve if darcs-wiki used a different backend?
> 
> Well, the Git backend is plenty fast so there definitely would be an
> improvement. But until someone converts the repo and tests it on
> test.darcs.net, I couldn't say how much of a one. One order? 2? How
> would it compare with a --max-count Darcsit? Dunno.

Sorry, I guess I misunderstood.  IIRC you were saying that if gitit
was using an sqlite backend, it wouldn't be able to look at mtimes.  I
thought you meant a filecache backend -- so the VCS would still be
Darcs.  Did you mean that sqlite was a (potential) alternative backend
to darcs/git?


More information about the darcs-users mailing list