[darcs-users] darcs patch: don't get unrecorded if filelist is empty
Eric Kow
kowey at darcs.net
Fri Apr 24 10:45:23 UTC 2009
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:46:49 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Benedikt Schmidt <beschmi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In changes, the unrecorded patch is only needed to transform the
> > filelist, so we do not need the unrecorded patch at all if the
> > list is empty. The problem is that if an empty filelist is passed
> > to get_unrecorded_in_files_unsorted, all files in the working
> > directory are examined.
>
> I think it would be useful to put this into the patch description.
Should I wait for an amended version?
darcs send --reply could be a useful trick here
(although if you're using the gmail web interface, getting those
Message-IDs is a bit laborious)
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090424/d68c9214/attachment.pgp>
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list